Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 747 No. 1: 13 Mar. 2026
Type: Article
Published: 2026-03-13
DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.747.1.4
Page range: 65-80
Abstract views: 0
PDF downloaded: 0

Morphological variability of Carex ×vratislaviensis (Cyperaceae) and its parent species—case from Central Europe

Department of Forest Botany, Dendrology and Geobiocenology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University, Zemědělská 3, CZ-613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
Černopolní 8, CZ-613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
Department of Forest Botany, Dendrology and Geobiocenology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University, Zemědělská 3, CZ-613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
Department of Botany, Moravian Museum, Hviezdoslavova 29a, CZ-627 00 Brno, Czech Republic
monocots sedges hybridization morphological features DFA analysis

Abstract

The article analyzes morphological variability and the possibility of distinguishing the hybrid sedge Carex ×vratislaviensis and its wetland parent species C. acuta and C. buekii in Central Europe. A large amount of data was obtained from herbarium material by measuring or evaluating 14 quantitative traits, 2 ratios and 8 qualitative features in 32 populations of the three taxa collected in Central Europe. The data were analysed by Dunn’s test and discriminant function analysis (DFA). Specimens of C. acuta, C. buekii and C. ×vratislaviensis form three clearly separate groups distinguishable by combination of 8 features: utricle length, presence of veins on the utricle surface, length of lowest inflorescence bract, width of female spikes, leaf width, stem length, spikes fertility and presence of the interrupted base of lowest female spike. The analysis also confirms the assumption of extensive variability of hybrid populations observed in the field. Intermediate morphotypes as well as variable plants closer to one or the other parent species are common. The length of the lower inflorescence bract, the length of the peduncle of the lower female spike, the length of the inflorescence and the length of the utricle are the traits that best characterize the studied hybrid.

References

  1. Abbott, R., Albach, D., Ansell, S., Arntzen, J.W., Baird, S.J.E., Bierne, N., Boughman, J., Brelsford, A., Buerkle, C.A., Buggs, R., Butlin, R.K., Dieckmann, U., Eroukhmanoff, F., Grill, A., Cahan, S.H., Hermansen, J.S., Hewitt, G., Hudson, A.G., Jiggins, C. & Zinner, D. (2013) Hybridization and speciation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 26: 229–246.
  2. Ascherson, P. & Graebner, P. (1904) Synopsis der mitteleuropäischen Flora. Vol. 2/2. Leipzig, H. Stürtz, 530 pp.
  3. Benítez-Benítez, C., Martín-Bravo, S., Bjorå, C.S., Gebauer, S., Hipp, A.L., Hoffmann, M.H., Luceño, M., Pedersen, T.M., Reznicek, A., Roalson, E., Volkova, P., Yano, O., Spalink, D. & Jiménez-Mejías, P. (2021) Geographical vs. ecological diversification in Carex section Phacocystis (Cyperaceae): Patterns hidden behind a twisted taxonomy. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 59: 642–667.
  4. Benkert, D. (1976) Cyperaceae Juss. In: Rothmaler, W., Schubert, R., Vent, W. & Bässler, M. (Eds.) Excursionsflora für die Gebiete der DDR und der BRD, Kritischer Band. Berlin, Volk und Wissen, pp. 653–685.
  5. Blackstock, N. & Ashton, P.A. (2010) Genetic markers and morphometric analysis reveal past hybridization and introgression in putative Carex flava L. s. str. (Cyperaceae) hybrid populations. Plant Systematics and Evolution 287: 37–47.
  6. Cayouette, J. & Catling, P.M. (1992) Hybridization in the genus Carex with special reference to North America. Botanical Review 58: 351–438.
  7. Dostál, J. (1950) Květena ČSR a ilustrovaný klíč k určení všech cévnatých rostlin. Vol. 2 [Flora of the Czechoslovak Republic and an illustrated key to the identification of all vascular plants]. Praha, Přírodovědecké nakladatelství, pp. 1009–2269.
  8. Dostál, J. (1989) Nová květena ČSSR. vol. 2 [New Flora of the Czechoslovak Republic]. Praha, Academia, pp. 765–1548.
  9. Dumortier, B.C.J. (1827) Florula Belgica. Operis majoris prodromus. J. Casterman, Tournay, 172 pp.
  10. Egorova, T.V. (1999) Osoki (Carex L.) Rossii i sopredel’nykh gosudarstv (v predelakh byvshego SSSR) [The sedges (Carex L.) of Russia and adjacent states (within the limits of the former USSR)]. Sankt-Peterburg & Saint-Louis, Sankt-Peterburgskaya Gosudarstvennaya Khimiko-farmatsevticheskaya Akademiya, 774 pp.
  11. Figert, E. (1900) Botanische Mitteilungen aus Schlesien IV. Allgemeine Botanische Zeitschrift für Systematik 6: 37–40.
  12. Fritsch, K. (1922) Exkursionsflora für Österreich und die ehemals österreichischen Nachbargebiete. Carl Gerold´s Sohn, Wien und Leipzig, 824 pp.
  13. Grulich, V. & Řepka, R. (2002) Carex L. – ostřice. In: Kubát, K. et al. (Eds.) Key to the Flora of the Czech Republic. Ed 1. Praha, Academia, pp. 801–820.
  14. Grulich, V. & Řepka, R. (2019) Carex L. – ostřice. In: Kaplan, Z. et al. (Eds.) Key to the Flora of the Czech Republic. Ed. 2. Praha, Academia, pp. 245–268.
  15. Grulich, V., Řepka, R. & Štěpánková, J. (2024) Carex L. – ostřice. In: Štěpánková, J., Kaplan, Z. & Chrtek, J. jun. (Eds.) Flora of the Czech Republic. Vol. 9. Praha, Academia, pp. 179–360.
  16. Chater, A.O. (1980) Carex. In: Tutin, T.G. et al. (Eds.) Flora Europaea. Vol. 5. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 290–323.
  17. Chytrý, M., Danihelka, J., Kaplan, Z., Wild, J., Holubová, D., Novotný, P., Řezníčková, M., Rohn, M., Dřevojan, P., Grulich, V., Klimešová, J., Lepš, J., Lososová, Z., Pergl, J., Sádlo, J., Šmarda, P., Štěpánková, P., Tichý, L., Axmanová, I., Bartušková, A., Blažek, P., Chrtek, J. Jr., Fischer, F.M., Guo, W.-Y., Herben, T., Janovský, Z., Konečná, M., Kühn, I., Moravcová, L., Petřík, P., Pierce, S., Prach, K., Prokešová, H., Štech, M., Těšitel, J., Těšitelová, T., Večeřa, M., Zelený, D. & Pyšek, P. (2021) Pladias Database of the Czech Flora and Vegetation. Preslia 93: 1–87.
  18. Janchen, E. (1959) Catalogus Florae Austriae. Vol. 1. Wien, Springer, 270 pp.
  19. Jiménez-Mejías, P., Martín-Bravo, S., Amini-Rad, M. & Luceño, M. (2014) Disentangling the taxonomy of Carex acuta s.l. in the Mediterranean basin and the Middle East: Re-evaluation of C. panormitana Guss. and C. kurdica Kük. ex Hand.-Mazz. Plant Biosystems 148: 64–73.
  20. Kaplan, Z., Koutecký, P., Danihelka, J., Šumberová, K., Ducháček, M., Štěpánková, J., Ekrt, L., Grulich, V., Řepka, R., Kubát, K., Mráz, P., Wild, J. & Brůna, J. (2018) Distributions of vascular plants in the Czech Republic. Part 6. Preslia 90: 235–346.
  21. Kiffe, K. (2004) Die bisher in Sachsen-Anhalt nachgewiesenen Hybriden innerhalb der Gattung Carex (Cyperaceae). Mitteilungen zur floristischen Kartierung in Sachsen-Anhalt 9: 33–40.
  22. Koopman, J., Dajdok, Z., Więcław, H., Martinetto, E., Grulich, V., Řepka, R. & Jiménez-Mejías, P. (2018) Global distribution of Carex buekii (Cyperaceae) reappraised. Phytotaxa 358: 139–161. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.358.2.3
  23. Kükenthal, G. (1909) Cyperaceae-Caricoideae. In: Engler, A. (Ed.) Das Pflanzenreich. Vol. 38. Leipzig, Wilhelm Engelmann, 824 pp.
  24. Lemke, W. (1963) Carex L.–Segge. In: Excursionsflora von Deutschland. Kritischer Ergänzungsband der Gefässpflanzen. Berlin, Volk und Wissen, pp. 55–67.
  25. Linnaeus, C. (1753) Species Plantarum. vol. 2. L. Salvius, Stockholm, 639 pp.
  26. Nowak, M.D., Pedersen, A.T.M., Brysting, A.K., Schrøder-Nielsen, A., Elven, R. & Bjorå, C.S. (2020) Testing hypotheses of hybrid origins for two seashore species of Carex section Phacocystis (Cyperaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 194: 100–117.
  27. PLADIAS (2025) Pladias–database of the Czech Flora and Vegetation. Available from: https://pladias.cz (accessed October 2025).
  28. Polívka, F., Domin, K. & Podpěra, J. (1928) Klíč k úplné květeně republiky Československé [The complete key to the Flora of the Czechoslovak Republic]. Olomouc, Promberger, 1088 pp.
  29. POWO (2023) Plants of the World Online. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Available from: http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org (accessed September 2024).
  30. R Core Team (2022) A language and environment for statistical computing (v. 4.2.0). R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [https://www.r-project.org/]
  31. Rieseberg, L.H. (1995) The role of hybridization in evolution: old wine in new skins. American Journal of Botany 82: 944–953.
  32. Rieseberg, L.H. (1997) Hybrid origins of plant species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28: 359–389.
  33. Roalson, E.H., Jiménez-Mejías, P., Hipp, A.L., Benítez-Benítez, C., Bruederle, L.P., Chung, K.-S., Escudero, M., Ford, B.A., Ford, K., Gebauer, S., Gehrke, B., Hahn, M., Qasim Hayat, M., Hoffmann, M.H., Jin, X.-F., Kim, S., Larridon, I., Léveillé-Bourret, É., Lu, Y.-F., Luceño, M., Maguilla, E., Márquez-Corro, J.I., Martín-Bravo, S., Masaki, T., Míguez, M., Naczi, R.F.C., Reznicek, A.A., Spalink, D., Starr, J.R., Villaverde, T., Waterway, M.J. & Zhang, S.-R. (2021) A framework infrageneric classification of Carex (Cyperaceae) and its organizing principles. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 59: 726–762.
  34. Řepka, R. (1985) O kříženci Carex ×vratislaviensis Figert (= C. buekii × C. gracilis) na Moravě [About the hybrid Carex ×vratislaviensis Figert (= C. buekii × C. gracilis) in Moravia]. Zprávy České Botanické Společnosti [Bulletin of the Czech Botanical Society] 20: 223–226.
  35. Řepka, R. (2023) Carex ×vratislaviensis. Zprávy České Botanické Společnosti [Bulletin of the Czech Botanical Society] 58: 48–50.
  36. Řepka, R. & Grulich, V. (2014) Ostřice České republiky. Terénní obrazový průvodce [Sedges of the Czech Republic. Field pictorial guide]. Brno, ČSOP Hořepník Prostějov and Mendel University, 208 pp.
  37. Schmidt, B. (1982) Karyology and hybridization in the Carex flava complex in Switzerland. Feddes Repertorium 93: 23–59.
  38. Schultze-Motel, W. (1968) Carex L. In: Hegi, G. & Bergdolt, E. (Eds.) Illustrierte Flora von Mittel-Europa. Vol. 2 (1). Ed. 3. Berlin, Hamburg, Paul Parey, pp. 96–274.
  39. Szafer, W. & Zarzycki, K. (1977) Szata roslinna Polski. Vol. 2. Warszawa, PWN, 346 pp.
  40. Vollrath, H. & Mergenthaler, O. (1966) Carex buekii in Bayern. Denkschriften der Regensburgischen Botanische Gesellschaft (Regensburg) 26: 23–54.
  41. Więcław, H. & Wilhelm, M. (2014) Natural hybridization within the Carex flava complex (Cyperaceae) in Poland: morphometric studies. Annales Botanici Fennici 51: 129–147.
  42. Więcław, H., Řepka, R. & Koopman, J. (2023) Lectotypification of two names of Carex buekii hybrids (Cyperaceae) and notes on their morphology, ecology and distribution. PhytoKeys 236: 179–186.
  43. Wild, J., Kaplan, Z., Danihelka, J., Petřík, P., Chytrý, M., Novotný, P., Rohn, M., Šulc, V., Brůna, J., Chobot, K., Ekrt, L., Holubová, D., Knollová, I., Kocián, P., Štech, M., Štěpánek, J. & Zouhar, V. (2019) Plant distribution data for the Czech Republic integrated in the Pladias database. Preslia 91: 1–24.
  44. Wimmer, C.F.H. (1857) Flora von Schlesien preussischen und österreichischen Antheils oder vom oberen Oder- und Weichsel-Quellen-Gebiet. Ed. 3. Ferdinand Hirt´s Verlag, Breslau, 695 pp.

How to Cite

Řepka, R., Řepka, J., Šebesta, J. & Taraška, V. (2026) Morphological variability of Carex ×vratislaviensis (Cyperaceae) and its parent species—case from Central Europe. Phytotaxa 747 (1): 65–80. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.747.1.4