Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Article
Published: 2026-03-13
Page range: 49-64
Abstract views: 0
PDF downloaded: 0

Seed morphological and morphometric traits as diagnostic tools for species-level classification in Indian Eulophia Lindl. (Eulophiinae; Orchidaceae)

Department of Botany, Shivaji University, Vidyanagar, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India-416004
Department of Botany, Shivaji University, Vidyanagar, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India-416004
Department of Botany, Shivaji University, Vidyanagar, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India-416004
Evolution morphometry sem systematic taxonomy testa Eulophia Monocots

Abstract

The present study evaluates whether seed morphometric and morphological traits can serve as reliable diagnostic tools for species-level classification within the genus Eulophia. Earlier phylogenetic studies have revealed paraphyly within the genus, indicating unresolved generic boundaries and uncertain relationships within the subtribe Eulophiinae. These contradictions in phylogenetic placement highlight persistent taxonomic challenges, necessitating supplementary morphological approaches to clarify species delimitation and evolutionary relationships. In this context, seed morphology and morphometry offer valuable insights. Using light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy, ten species of Eulophia were analyzed for testa and embryo dimensions, testa-to-embryo volume ratios, air space, and surface ornamentation. Testa length ranged from 0.493–1.619 mm and testa width from 1.586–2.734 mm, with testa-to-embryo volume ratios varying from 3–21, reflecting species-specific patterns. Cluster analysis grouped the species into three major clusters, with E. graminea occupying an intermediate position that linked two groups. In the current study, almost all species having air space exceeded 80%, indicating adaptations for wind-mediated seed dispersal. Importantly, all the species used in this study reflect diverse habitats across India, thereby representing the full range of Eulophia taxa available in the country. Seed morphology supports the taxonomic value of seed traits. The morphometric variation is discussed in the context of dispersal related attributes and their significance as baseline data for the conservation of the genus Eulophia.

References

  1. Arditti, J., Michaud, J.D. & Healey, P.L. (1979) Morphometry of orchid seeds. I. Paphiopedilum and native California, and related species of Cypripedium. American Journal of Botany 66 (10): 1128–1137. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1979.tb06332.x
  2. Arditti, J., Michaud, J.D. & Healey, P.L. (1980a) Morphometry of orchid seeds. II. Native California and related species of Calypso, Cephalanthera, Corallorhiza and Epipactis. American Journal of Botany 67 (4): 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1980.tb07660.x
  3. Arditti, J., Michaud, J.D. & Healey, P.L. (1980b) Morphometry of orchid seeds. III. Native California and related species of Goodyera, Piperia, Platanthera and Spiranthes. American Journal of Botany 67 (4): 508–518. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1980.tb07678.x
  4. Augustine, J., Kumar, Y. & Sharma, J. (2001) Orchids of India II: Biodiversity and status of Bulbophyllum. Daya Publishing House, New Delhi, 113 pp.
  5. Barthlott, W., Große-Veldmann, B. & Korotkova, N. (2014) Orchid seed diversity: A scanning electron microscopy survey. Englera 32: 3–245.
  6. Barthlott, W. & Ziegler, B. (1980) Über ausziehbare helicale Zellwandverdickungen als Haft-Apparat der Samenschalen von Chiloschista lunifera (Orchidaceae). Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 93: 391–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1980.tb03349.x
  7. Bone, R.E., Cribb, P.J. & Buerki, S. (2015) Phylogenetics of Eulophiinae (Orchidaceae: Epidendroideae): evolutionary patterns and implications for generic delimitation. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 179 (1): 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12299
  8. Brown, R. (1810) Prodromus floræ Novæ Hollandiæ et Insulæ Van-Diemen: exhibens characteres plantarum quas annis 1802-1805. R. Taylor et socii, London, 580 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.52309
  9. Brown, R. (1821) Lissochilus speciosus. Mr. Griffin’s Lissochilus. Botanical Register 7: t. 573 (578).
  10. Chase, M.W., Kumar, P. & Schuiteman, A. (2021) Expansion of the orchid genus Eulophia (Eulophiinae; Epidendroideae) to include Acrolophia, Cymbidiella, Eulophiella, Geodorum, Oeceoclades and Paralophia. Phytotaxa 491 (1): 47–56. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.491.1.5
  11. Christenhusz, M.J.M. & Byng, J.W. (2016) The number of known plant species in the world and its annual increase. Phytotaxa 261 (3): 201–217. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.261.3
  12. Cieślicka, D. (2006) The problems of infrageneric classification of Eulophia R.Br. ex Lindl. (Orchidaceae, Cymbidiinae). Biodiversity: Research and Conservation 3–4: 210–212. https://doi.org/10.14746/biorc.2006.3-4.3
  13. Cribb, P. (1989) Flora of Tropical East Africa: Orchidaceae. Part 3. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 422–480.
  14. Cribb, P.J., Kell, S.P., Dixon, K.W. & Barrett, R.L. (2003) Orchid conservation: A global perspective. In: Dixon, K.W., Kell, S.P., Barrett, R.L. & Cribb, P.J. (Eds.) Orchid Conservation. Natural History Publications (Borneo), Kota Kinabalu, pp. 1–42.
  15. Dai, X.Y., Jiang, M.T., Li, W., Zhao, Y.M., Chen, L., Zhai, J.W., Peng, D.H. & Wu, S.S. (2020) The taxonomic revision of Pleione formosana (Arethuseae, Epidendroideae, Orchidaceae) based on molecular, morphological and cytological analyses. Phytotaxa 477 (1): 60–70. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.477.1.4
  16. Dangat, B.T. & Gurav, R.V. (2016) Studies on seed morphometry of Habenaria species from the Western Ghats, India. Richardiana 16: 174–188.
  17. Diantina, S., McGill, C., Millner, J., Nadarajan, J., Pritchard, H.W. & Clavijo McCormick, A. (2020) Comparative seed morphology of tropical and temperate orchid species with different growth habits. Plants 9 (2): 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9020161
  18. Don, D. (2016) Prodromus florae Nepalensis: sive Enumeratio vegetabilium quae in itinere per Nepaliam proprie dictam et regiones conterminas, ann. 1802-1803. Detexit atque legit d. d. Franciscus Hamilton, (olim Buchanan) Accedunt plantae a. d. Wallich nuperius missae. J. Gale, Londini, 256 pp.
  19. Fay, M.F., Andriamahefarivo, L., Bachman, S.P., Brown, M.J.M., Calevo, J., Campbell, T., Charitonidou, M., Dixon, K.W., Droissart, V., Forest, F., Hinsley, A.E., Kumar, P., Le Breton, T., Rajaovelona, L.R., Ramandimbisoa, B., Rankou, H., Schuiteman, A., Sharma, J., Simo-Droissart, M., Smidt, E.C., Stévart, T., Svahnström, V.J., Verlynde, S. & Zimmer, H.C. (2025) How threatened are orchids? A review of the state of play and identification of gaps and priorities. Biodiversity and Conservation 34: 5075–5115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-025-03187-7
  20. Galán Cela, P., Seligrat, I., Ortúñez, E., Gamarra, R., Vivar, A. & Scrugli, A. (2014) A study of seed micromorphology in the genus Ophrys (Orchidaceae). Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid 71: 08. https://doi.org/10.3989/ajbm.2370
  21. Gamarra, R., Dorda, E., Scrugli, A., Galán, P. & Ortúñez, E. (2007) Seed micromorphology in the genus Neotinea Rchb.f. (Orchidaceae, Orchidinae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 153: 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2006.00603.x
  22. Gamarra, R., Ortúñez, E., Galán Cela, P. & Guadaño, V. (2012) Anacamptis versus Orchis (Orchidaceae): Seed micromorphology and its taxonomic significance. Plant Systematics and Evolution 298: 597–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-011-0569-1
  23. Govaerts, R., Nic Lughadha, E., Black, N., Turner, R. & Paton, A. (2021) The world checklist of vascular plants, a continuously updated resource for exploring global plant diversity. Scientific Data 8: 215. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00997-6
  24. Güler, N. (2016) Seed micromorphology of Orchis Tourn. ex L. (Orchidaceae) and allied genera growing in Edirne Province, Turkey. PhytoKeys 68: 9–25. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.68.8746
  25. Hall, A.V. (1965) Studies of the South African species of Eulophia. Journal of South African Botany 5 (Suppl.): 1–248.
  26. Hariyanto, S., Sucipto, Pratiwi, I.A. & Utami, E.S.W. (2020) Seed morphometry of native Indonesian orchids in the genus Dendrobium. Scientifica 2020: 3986369 (14 pp.). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3986369
  27. Hochreutiner, B.P.G. (1910) Critical Notes on new or little known species in the Herbarium of the New York Botanical Garden. Bulletin of the New York Botanical Garden 6 (21): 262.
  28. Hooker, J.D. (1890) Flora of British India. Vol. 6. Reeve, London, 792 pp.
  29. Jadhav, M.S., Momin, S.A., Goswami, A. & Gurav, R.V. (2025) Advanced metabolomics profiling and antioxidant activity of the endemic orchid Eulophia explanata Lindl. through qualitative, quantitative and UPLC Q-TOF. Journal of Medicinal Plants Studies 13 (6): 336–347. https://doi.org/10.22271/plants.2025.v13.i6b.1990
  30. Jeeja, G. & Ansari, R. (1994) Taxonomic significance of seed surface morphology in Orchidaceae. Rheedea 4 (1): 48–59.
  31. Jussieu, A.L. de. (1789) Genera plantarum: secundum ordines naturelles disposita, juxta methodum in Horto regio parisiensi exaratam, anno M.DCC.LXXIV. Parisiis, Apud Viduam Herissant et Theophilum Barrois, 498 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.284
  32. Kraenzlin, F. (1897) Eulophia sect. Pulchrae. The Gardeners’ Chronicle: a weekly illustrated journal of horticulture and allied subjects Ser. 3, 22: 262.
  33. Kull, T. & Arditti, J. (2002) Orchid biology: Reviews and perspectives, VIII. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 584 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2500-2
  34. Lim, S., Park, S., Baek, I., Botkin, J., Jang, J.E., Hong, S.M., Irish, B.M., Kim, M.S., Meinhardt, L.W., Curtin, S.J. & Ahn, E. (2025) Integrative analysis of seed morphology, geographic origin, and genetic structure in Medicago with implications for breeding and conservation. BMC Plant Biology 25: 274. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-06304-4
  35. Lindley, J. (1823) Eulophia guineensis. Sierra Leone Eulophia. Botanical Register 8: t. 686.
  36. Lindley, J. (1832) Angraecum eburneum. Ivory Angraceum. Edwards’s Botanical Register 18: t. 1522.
  37. Lindley, J. (1833) The Genera and species of orchidaceous plants. Ridgways, London, 553 pp.
  38. Lindley, J. (1858) Professor Lindley’s contributions to the Orchidology of India. Journal of the Linnean Society 3: 24–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1858.tb02055.x
  39. Martos, F., Johnson, S.D., Peter, C. & Bytebier, B. (2014) A molecular phylogeny reveals paraphyly of the large genus Eulophia (Orchidaceae): A case for the reinstatement of Orthochilus. Taxon 63: 9–23. https://doi.org/10.12705/631.6
  40. Molvray, M. & Kores, J.P. (1995) Character analysis of the seed coat in Spiranthoideae with special reference to the Diurideae (Orchidaceae). American Journal of Botany 82 (11): 1443–1453. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1995.tb12682.x
  41. Naïve, M.A.K., Hein, K.Z., Kumar, P. & Ormerod, P. (2022) Eulophia myanmarica (Orchidaceae), a new species from Myanmar and notes on Geodorum densiflorum. Phytotaxa 548 (2): 288–294. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.548.2.11
  42. Perrier de la Bâthie, H. (1935) The Eulophia of Madagascar. Bulletin of the Botanical Society of France 82: 146–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00378941.1935.10832966
  43. Perrier de la Bâthie, H. (1941) Humbert, Flora of Madagascar, 49. Official Printing Press, Tananarive, Madagascar, pp. 289–298.
  44. Pfitzer, E. (1887) Orchidaceae. In: Engler, A. & Prantl, K. (Eds.) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2, 6. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany, pp. 59.
  45. Rani, U., Singh, S.G., Gupta, S. & Garg, V. (1993) Morphometry of orchid seeds in Epidendroidae as revealed by SEM. Advances in Plant Sciences 6: 128–133.
  46. Reichenbach, H.G. (1872) Neue Orchideen entdeckt und gesammelt von Herrn Gustav Mann. Flora 55 (18): 273–278.
  47. Şeker, Ş.S. & Şenel, G. (2017) Comparative seed micromorphology and morphometry of some orchid species (Orchidaceae) belonging to the related Anacamptis, Orchis and Neotinea genera. Biologia 72 (1): 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2017-0006
  48. Shriram, V. & Kumar, V. (2022) Eulophia spp.: In Vitro Generation, Chemical Constituents, and Pharmacological Activities. In: Mérillon, J.M. & Kodja, H. (Eds.) Orchids Phytochemistry, Biology and Horticulture. Reference Series in Phytochemistry. Springer, Cham, pp. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11257-8_31-1
  49. Singh, S.K., Agrawala, D.K., Jalal, J., Dash, S.S., Mao, A. & Singh, P. (2020) Orchids of India—A Pictorial Guide. Botanical survey of India, Kolkata, pp. 279–288.
  50. Smith, J.J. (1905) Die Orchideen von Java. E.J.Brill, Leiden, 672 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.86938
  51. Thomas, S.A. (1998) A preliminary checklist of the genus Eulophia. Lindleyana 13 (3): 170–202.
  52. Thouars, L.-M.A. du P. (1809) Extrait de trois Mémories lus à la première class de l’Institut, sur l’histoire des plantes Orchidées des iles australes d’ Afrique. Nouveau Bulletin des Sciences 1 (19): 314–318.
  53. Thouars, L.-M.A. du P. (1822) Flore des iles australes de l’Afrique: Histoire particulière des plantes orchidées recueillies dans les trois îles australes d’Afrique, de France, de Bourbon et de Madagascar. pp. 43–44.
  54. Tohda, H. (1983) Seed morphology in Orchidaceae I: Dactylorchis, Orchis, Ponerorchis, Chondradenia and Galeorchis. Scientific Reports of Tohoku Imperial University, Ser. 4, Biology 38: 253–268.
  55. Vafaee, Y., Mohammadi, G., Nazari, F., Fatahi, M., Kaki, A., Gholami, S., Ghorbani, A. & Khadivi, A. (2021) Phenotypic characterization and seed-micromorphology diversity of the threatened terrestrial orchids: Implications for conservation. South African Journal of Botany 137: 386–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2020.11.010
  56. Verma, J., Sharma, K., Thakur, K., Sembi, J.K. & Vij, S.P. (2014) Study on seed morphometry of some threatened Western Himalayan orchids. Turkish Journal of Botany 38 (2): 234–251. https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-1307-14
  57. Vij, S.P., Kaur, P., Kaur, S. & Kaushal, P.S. (1992) The orchid seeds: Taxonomic, evolutionary and functional aspects. Journal of Orchid Society of India 6: 91–107.

How to Cite

Jadhav, M., Momin, S. & Gurav, R. (2026) Seed morphological and morphometric traits as diagnostic tools for species-level classification in Indian Eulophia Lindl. (Eulophiinae; Orchidaceae). Phytotaxa 747 (1): 49–64. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.747.1.3