Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 622 No. 5: 3 Nov. 2023
Type: Article
Published: 2023-11-03
DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.622.5.1
Page range: 271-280
Abstract views: 80
PDF downloaded: 9

Taxonomic delineation of two closely allied Rubus L. (Rosaceae) species with notes on the typification of the name R. fairholmianus

Department of Biotechnology; Centre for Research and Evaluation; Bharathiar University; Coimbatore; Tamil Nadu; India; 641046
CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute; Rana Pratap Marg; Lucknow-226001; Uttar Pradesh; India
Centre for Environment and Marine Studies; Research Institute-King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals-Dhahran; Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Centre for Medicinal Plants Research (CMPR); Arya Vaidya Sala; Kottakkal; Malappuram-676 503; Kerala; India
Department of Plant Science; Manonmaniam Sundaranar University; Abishekapatti; Tirunelveli-627012; Tamil Nadu; India
Department of Bioscience; MES College; Marampally; Aluva-683107; Kerala; India
Eudicots India neotypification Rubus fairholmianus R. micropetalus taxonomic identity

Abstract

Rubus fairholmianus Gardner and R. micropetalus Gardner are the two closely allied taxa, collected from different localities of southern Western Ghats, India. Because of the absence of detailed description and the existence of morphological similarities, these taxa have been misidentified in many herbaria and other published floras. The present study discusses the major delineating features of both the taxa based on the conventional taxonomic studies and along with seed morphological analysis and also provides a note on the occurrence of R. moluccanus L. in Western Ghats. During the study, the name R. fairholmianus is also neotypified.

References

  1. Dassanayake, M.D. & Fosberg, F.R. (1981) A revised handbook to the flora of Ceylon, Vol. III. Amerind Publishing Company, New Dehli, pp. 339–359.
  2. Focke, W.O. (1911) Species Ruborum monographiae generis Rubi prodromus. Bibliotheca Botanica 17: 121–223. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.15533
  3. Gamble, J.S. (1919) Flora of the Presidency of Madras, Vol 2. Adlard & Son, Ltd., London, pp. 439–442.
  4. Gardner, G. (1848) Contributions towards flora of Ceylon. Calcutta Journal of Natural History Society 8 (1847): 5–8.
  5. George, B.P., Parimelazhagan, T. & Chandran, R. (2014) Anti-inflammatory and wound healing properties of Rubus fairholmianus Gard. Root-an in vivo study. Industrial Crops and Products 54: 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.01.037
  6. Gupta, C., Dash, S.S. & Brach, A.R. (2016) Lectotypification of two names in the genus Rubus L. (Rosaceae). Phytotaxa 266 (4): 297–300. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.266.4.8
  7. Hooker, J.D. (1878) Rosaceae. In: Hooker, J.D. (Ed.) The Flora of British India, Vol 2. L. Reeve & Co., London, pp. 307–342.
  8. Kalkman, C. (1993) Rosaceae. Flowering Plants Seri. I- Spermatophyta. Flora Malesiana 11 (2): 227–351.
  9. Linnaeus, C. (1753) Species Plantarum, Vol. 1. Laurentii Salvii, Stochholm (Holmiae), 560 pp.
  10. Lu, L.D. & Boufford, D.E. (2003) Rubus L. In: Wu, Z.H. & Raven, P.H. (Eds.) Flora of China, 9. Science Press, Beijing and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, pp. 195–286.
  11. Merrill, E.D. (1917) An interpretation of Rumphius’s herbarium Amboinense. Bureau of Printing, Manila, pp. 245–246. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.79163
  12. Narayanan, B. & Umesh, B.T. (2018) Lectotypification of the name Rubus micropetalus (Rosaceae). Annals of Plant Sciences 7 (6): 2352–2353.
  13. POWO (Plants of the World Online) Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. Available from: https://powo.science.kew.org/ (accessed 7 August 2023)
  14. Sasidharan, N. (2013) Flowering plants of Kerala: CD-ROM ver 2.0. Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi, Thrissur.
  15. Thiers, B. (2011) Continuously updated. Index Herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium. [https://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/herbariumlist/?NamOrganisationAcronym=cmpr]
  16. Thompson, M.M. (1997) Survey of chromosome numbers in Rubus (Rosaceae: Rosoideae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 84 (1): 128–164. https://doi.org/10.2307/2399958
  17. Turland, N.J., Wiersema, J.H., Barrie, F.R., Greuter, W., Hawksworth, D.L., Herendeen, P.S., Knapp, S., Kusber, W.H., Li, D.Z., Marhold, K., May. T.W., McNeill, J., Monro, A.M., Prado, J., Price, M.J. & Smith, G.F. (Eds.) (2018) International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017. Koeltz Botanical Books, Glashütten. https://doi.org/10.12705/Code.2018