Erratum: Di Pietro, R., Kuzmanović, N., Lakušić, D., Viciani, D., Fortini, P. &amp; Iamonico, D. (2021) Nomenclatural and taxonomic notes on some names of Sesleria sect. Argenteae (Poaceae) from Italy and the Balkans. Phytotaxa 494 (1): 89–102.

ROMEO DI PIETRO; DUILIO IAMONICO; NEVENA KUZMANOVIC

doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.502.2.10

Issue: Vol. 502 No. 2: 24 May 2021

Type: Erratum

Published: 2021-05-24

DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.502.2.10

Page range: 217–218

Abstract views: 16

PDF downloaded: 13

Erratum: Di Pietro, R., Kuzmanović, N., Lakušić, D., Viciani, D., Fortini, P. & Iamonico, D. (2021) Nomenclatural and taxonomic notes on some names of Sesleria sect. Argenteae (Poaceae) from Italy and the Balkans. Phytotaxa 494 (1): 89–102.

ROMEO DI PIETRO⁺⁻
DUILIO IAMONICO⁺⁻
NEVENA KUZMANOVIC⁺⁻

Department PDTA, University of Rome Sapienza, 00196 Rome, Italy

Department of Biology, Botany Unit, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy

Institute of Botany and Botanical Garden, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia

Poaceae Monocots

PDF (1MB)

Abstract

In our recent paper, we noticed a mistake concerning figure 2 (Di Pietro et al. 2021: 93). According to the caption, figure 2 should represent the sheet FI051890 (a lectotype of Sesleria nitida var. tenoreana f. visianii). In fact, in the place of the sheet FI051890, a figure containing two herbarium specimens deposited in PAD (PAD-HD00955 and PAD-HD00956) was erroneously published. These two PAD specimens were discussed in the paper (Di Pietro et al. 2021: 94) where it was highlighted that these could not be considered with certainty as original material for Sesleria nitida var. tenoreana f. visianii Pampanini (1917: 4).

We here, correct the mistake and publish the image of lectotype of Sesleria nitida var. tenoreana f. visianii (FI051890, Fig. 1).