Abstract
Regrettably, two names in Vermeulen et al. (2014) were not validly published because the basionym references were omitted or incorrectly given (Melbourne Code, 2012: Art. 41.5). In addition, we overlooked Saccoglossum maculatum, which needs a new name in Bulbophyllum. We thank Irina Belyaeva (K) and Anton Sieder (WU) for bringing these omissions to our attention.