Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Article
Published: 2025-02-24
Page range: 253-261
Abstract views: 96
PDF downloaded: 11

Taxonomic reassessment of Astragalus phanothrix (Fabaceae): insights from morphological and molecular data

Department of Plant and Animal Biology, Faculty of Biological Science and Technology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, 81746-73441, Iran
Botany Research Division, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), 13185–116, Tehran, Iran
Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), 06466 Seeland-Gatersleben, Germany. German Centre of Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Astragalus phanothrix taxonomic revision Hypoglottidei Onobrychoidei phylogeny morphology synonymy Turkey Eudicots

Abstract

Astragalus phanothrix has long been a taxonomically controversial species due to conflicting synonymizations and section placements. Originally described under sect. Onobrychium by Bornmüller in 1915, it was later transferred to sect. Hypoglottidei and synonymized with A. saganlugensis. Recent treatments synonymized it with A. cancellatus within sect. Onobrychoidei, highlighting persistent taxonomic ambiguities arising from overlapping morphological characters and the lack of integrative analyses. This study reassessed the taxonomic status of A. phanothrix using morphological examinations and molecular phylogenetic analyses of ITS and matK sequences. Morphological comparisons revealed key diagnostic characters that distinguish A. phanothrix from its putative synonyms. Astragalus phanothrix differs from A. saganlugensis by its mixed black and white hairs on the calyx (compared to erect stems with sparser indumentum), and smaller ovate legumes (compared to larger, elliptic legumes). From A. cancellatus it is separated by the absence of bifurcate calyx hairs, its placement in sect. Hypoglottidei (versus sect. Onobrychoidei), and its predominantly white hairs on the peduncle (compared to mixed black and white hairs). Phylogenetic analyses placed A. phanothrix firmly within sect. Hypoglottidei, supporting its recognition as an independent species. These findings resolve the taxonomic doubts surrounding A. phanothrix, re-establishing it as a distinct species, and highlight the value of integrating morphological and molecular evidence to clarify complex taxonomic relationships in Astragalus.

References

  1. Aytaç, Z. (2000) Astragalus L. In: Güner, A., Özhatay, N., Ekim, T. & Başer, K.H.C. (Eds.) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Vol. 11. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 79–88.
  2. Bagheri, A., Maassoumi, A.A. & Vitek, E. (2018) Rediscovery of Astragalus saganlugensis (Fabaceae, Galegeae) in Iran after 184 years. Phytotaxa 350: 297–299. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.350.3.9
  3. Bagheri, A., Maassoumi, A.A., Brassac, J. & Blattner, F.R. (2023) Dated phylogeny of Astragalus section Stereothrix (Fabaceae) and allied taxa in the Hypoglottis clade. Biology 12: 138. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12010138
  4. Boissier, E. (1872) Flora orientalis sive, enumeratio plantarum in Oriente a Graecia et Aegypto ad Indiae fines hucusque observatarum. Vol. 2. H. Georg, Geneva & Basilea, 210 pp.
  5. Bornmüller, J.F.N. (1915) Drei neue Astragalus—Arten aus der orientalischen Flora. Magyar Botanikai Lapok (Ungarische Botanische Blätter) 14: 51–55.
  6. Bunge, A. (1868) Generis Astragali spec. Gerontogeae. Pars altera, Specierum enumeration. Mémoires de l’Académie Impériale des Sciences de Saint Pétersbourg, Septième série 7, 11: 1–140.
  7. Bunge, A. (1869) Generis Astragali species Gerontogeae. Pars altera, Specierum enumeration. Mémoires de l’Académie Impériale des Sciences de Saint Pétersbourg, Septième série 7, 15: 1–245.
  8. Candolle, A.P. de (1802) Astragalogia nempe Astragali, Biserrulae et Oxytropidis, nec non Phacae, Colutae et Lessertiae, Historia iconibus illustrata. J.B. Garnery, Paris, 269 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.517
  9. Candolle, A.P. de (1825) Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis. Vol. 2. Paris, 281 pp.
  10. Chamberlain, D.F. & Matthews, V.A. (1970) Astragalus L. In: Davis, P.H. (Ed.) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Vol. 3. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 49–254.
  11. Conti, F. & Stinca, A. (2023) Anthyllis dalmatica (Fabaceae), a new endemic species from Croatia. Systematic Botany 48 (3): 435–446. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364423X16936046516372
  12. Edgar, R.C. (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32: 1792–1797. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340
  13. Forsskål, P. (1775) Flora Aegyptiaco-Arabica. Sive Descriptiones Plantarum, Quas per Aegyptum Inferiorem et Arabium Felicem Detexit. Post mortem auctoris edidit Carsten Niebuhr. Hauniae, 220 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.6625
  14. Gontscharow, N.F. (1947) Botanicheskie Materialy Gerbariya Botanicheskogo Instituta Imeni V. L. Komarova Akademii Nauk S.S.S.R. Vol. 10. Leningrad [St. Petersburg], 33 pp.
  15. Linnaeus, C. von (1753) Species Plantarum. Laurentius Salvius, Stockholm, 1200 pp.
  16. Maassoumi, A.A. (2018) Flora of Iran, Fabaceae (Astragalus III). Vol. 145. Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Tehran.
  17. Maassoumi, A.A. (2020) The comprehensive online resource for mega genus of Astragalus. Version 1. Available from: https://astragalusofworld.com (accessed 15 December 2024)
  18. Maassoumi, A.A., Ashouri, P. & Khajoei Nasab, F. (2022) An overview of the evolution of the genus Astragalus (Fabaceae) in the Old World. Taxonomy and Biosystematics 14: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.22108/tbj.2022.133218.1196
  19. Meyer, K.A. (1831) Verzeichniss der Pflanzen, welche während der, auf allerhöchsten Befehl, in den Jahren 1829 und 1830 unternommenen Reise im Caucasus und in den Provinzen am westlichen Ufer des Caspischen Meeres gefunden und eingesammelt worden sind. St. Petersbourg, 241 pp.
  20. Nylander, J.A.A. (2004) MrModeltest v2. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
  21. Podlech, D. & Zarre, S. (2013) A taxonomic revision of the genus Astragalus L. (Leguminosae) in the Old World. Vols. 1–3. Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, 2439 pp.
  22. Perrino, E.V., Mahmoud, Z.N.A., Valerio, F., Tomaselli, V., Wagensommer, R.P. & Trani, A. (2023) Synecology of Lagoecia cuminoides L. in Italy and evaluation of functional compounds presence in its water or hydroalcoholic extracts. Scientific Reports 13: 20906. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48065-w
  23. Ronquist, F., Teslenko, M., van der Mark, P., Ayres, D.L., Darling, A., Höhna, S., Larget, B., Liu, L., Suchard, M.A. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  24. Thiers, B. (2024) Index herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium, New York. Available from: http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/ (accessed 15 December 2024)
  25. Trautvetter, E.R. (1858) Incrementa Florae Phaenogamae Rossicae. Bulletin de la Class Physico-Mathematique de l’Academie Imperiale des Sciences de Saint-Pétersbourg 16: 323.
  26. Turco, A., Medagli, P., Wagensommer, R.P., D’Emerico, S., Gennaio, R. & Albano, A. (2022) A morphometric study on Ophrys sect. Pseudophrys in Apulia (Italy) and discovery of Ophrys japigiae sp. nov. (Orchidaceae). Plant Biosystems 156: 560–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2021.1897702
  27. Wagensommer, R.P., Perrino, E.V., Albano, A., Medagli, P. & Passalacqua, N.G. (2016) Lectotypification of four Lacaita’s names in the genus Centaurea (Asteraceae). Phytotaxa 269: 54–58. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.269.1.7
  28. Willdenow, C.L. (1802) Species Plantarum Editio Quarta. vol. 3 (2). Berolini [Berlin], pp. 849–1474.

How to Cite

Bagheri, A., Maassoumi, A.A. & Blattner, F.R. (2025) Taxonomic reassessment of Astragalus phanothrix (Fabaceae): insights from morphological and molecular data. Phytotaxa 689 (2): 253–261. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.689.2.8