Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 666 No. 3: 3 Oct. 2024
Type: Article
Published: 2024-10-03
DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.666.3.2
Page range: 188-200
Abstract views: 112
PDF downloaded: 5

Morphological diversity and taxonomic implications of seedling structures in selected species of Fabaceae from Karachi (Pakistan)

Department of Botany, Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology, Gulshan-e-Iqbal Campus, Karachi, Pakistan. Department of Botany, The University of Chakwal, Chakwal-48800, Pakistan.
Department of Botany, Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology, Gulshan-e-Iqbal Campus, Karachi, Pakistan.
Department of Botany, Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology, Gulshan-e-Iqbal Campus, Karachi, Pakistan.
Department of Botany, Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology, Gulshan-e-Iqbal Campus, Karachi, Pakistan.
Department of Botany, Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology, Gulshan-e-Iqbal Campus, Karachi, Pakistan.
Department of Botany, The University of Chakwal, Chakwal-48800, Pakistan.
Department of Botany, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur-63100, Pakistan.
Seedling morphology Fabaceae taxonomy cotyledon shape dendrogram analysis eophyll classification Eudicots

Abstract

Seedling morphology is a valuable tool for plant identification and classification, particularly in early growth stages. This study investigates the morphological characters of seedlings from randomly selected taxa within the Fabaceae family, focusing on cotyledons, first two leaves, and subsequent leaves to support taxonomic differentiation. Not all subfamilies within Fabaceae are fully represented in this study. Seedlings from 14 randomly selected taxa were analyzed using morphological traits such as cotyledon shape, phyllotaxy, leaf shape, and venation patterns. An artificial key was constructed, and three dendrograms were developed based on cotyledon morphology, first two leaves, and subsequent leaves to illustrate taxonomic relationships. Statistical analyses were employed to assess clustering patterns among the taxa. The artificial key categorized the taxa into subfamilies within Fabaceae, including Caesalpinoideae, Mimosoideae, and Papilionoideae, based on cotyledon shape and leaf morphology. Dendrogram analysis revealed distinct clustering patterns, grouping species according to key morphological features. Not all subfamilies of Fabaceae were covered, but the analysis provided clear separation among the species studied. The morphological traits observed were consistent with previous taxonomic findings and offered a reliable basis for classification. The morphological features of seedlings, especially cotyledons and eophylls, serve as reliable taxonomic markers for identifying and classifying species within Fabaceae. Although the study does not encompass all subfamilies, the randomly selected taxa demonstrated clear taxonomic distinctions. Dendrograms combined with artificial keys provided a useful framework for classification. Further studies should expand the scope to include more taxa, covering all subfamilies of Fabaceae. Integrating molecular and other taxonomic tools such as anatomy, cytology, and chemistry can enhance the precision of classification frameworks and provide deeper insights into the evolutionary relationships within the family.

References

  1. Ahammed, J. & Paria, N. (1996) Systematic value of seedling morphology in some Indian Asteraceae. Acta Botanica Indica 24 (1): 49–55.
  2. Almeida, O.J., Paoli, A.A., Souza, L.A. & Cota-Sánchez, J.H. (2013) Seedling morphology and development in the epiphytic cactus Epiphyllum phyllanthus (L.) Haw. (Cactaceae: Hylocereeae). The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 140 (2): 196–214. https://doi.org/10.3159/TORREY-D-12-00031.1
  3. Andreata, R.H.P. & Pereira, T.S. (1990) Morfologia das plântulas de algumas espécies de Smilax L. Pesquisas Botânica 41: 7–24.
  4. Augustine, K.T. (2004) Seedling morphology of Cassytha filiformis L. (Lauraceae) from Thumba, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala. Journal of Economic and Taxonomic Botany 28 (1): 107–109.
  5. Bau Baudet, J.C. (1974) Signification taxonomique des caractères blastogèniques dans la tribu des Papilionaceae-Phaseoleae. Bulletin du Jardin botanique national de Belgique/Bulletin van de Nationale Plantentuin van Belgie 44: 259–293. https://doi.org/10.2307/3667674
  6. Beltrati, C.M. (1978) Morphological and anatomical studies of the seeds and seedlings of Eucalyptus citriodora and E. maculata. Revista de Biologia Tropical 26: 213–225.
  7. Ben Mahmoud, K., Mezzapesa, G.N., Abdelkefi, F. & Perrino, E.V. (2024) Nutritional value and functional properties of an underexploited Tunisian wild beet (Beta macrocarpa Guss.) in relation to soil characteristics. Euro-Mediterranean Journal for Environmental Integration 9: 705–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41207-024-00468-5
  8. Bose, A., Das, P. & Paria, N.D. (2017) Taxonomic treatment of some Indian Magnolia L. in respect to seedling morphology. Feddes Repertorium 128 (1–2): 9–16.
  9. Brooker, M.I.H. (1970) Seedling morphology and classification in the Bisectae group of eucalypts. Australian Journal of Botany 18 (1): 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT9700067
  10. Buendia, F., Ruiz del Castillo, J. & Ferreiro, T. (1966) Smillas y plántulas de leguminosas pratenses. Españolas.
  11. Butt, M.A., Zafar, M., Ahmad, M., Kayani, S., Bahadur, S., Ullah, F. & Khatoon, S. (2021) The use of taxonomic studies to the identification of wetlands weeds. Advances in Weed Science 39: e222645.
  12. Canne, J.M. (1983) The taxonomic significance of seedling morphology in Agalinis (Scrophulariaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 61 (7): 1868–1874. https://doi.org/10.1139/b83-197
  13. Casella, F., Vurro, M., Valerio, F., Perrino, E.V., Mezzapesa, G.N. & Boari, A. (2023) Phytotoxic Effects of Essential oils from Six Lamiaceae Species. Agronomy 13: 257. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13010257
  14. Compton, R.H. (1912) An investigation of the seedling structure in the Leguminosae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 41 (279): 1–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1912.tb02313.x
  15. De Candolle, A.P. (1825) Leguminosae. Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 2: 93–524.
  16. De Vogel, E.F. (1980) Seedlings of Dicotyledons: Structure, Development, Types. Descriptions of 150 Woody Malesian Taxa. Wageningen: Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation (Pudoc).
  17. Gardner, C.S. (1986) Preliminary classification of Tillandsia based on floral characters. Selbyana 9: 130–146.
  18. Gibreel, H.H., Salih, R.R.M. & Yagoub, Y.E. (2019) Seed germination and seedling morphology as a tool for taxonomic study on Vachellia nilotica (L.) PJH Hurter and Mabb. (Synonym: Acacia nilotica (L.) Willd. ex Delile) in the Sudan. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine 7 (4): 43–56.
  19. Gunn, C.R. (1981) Seeds of Leguminosae. In: Polhill, R.M. & Raven, P.H. (Eds.) Advances in Legume Systematics. Royal Botanic Gardens, pp. 913–925.
  20. Gunn, C.R. (1984) Fruits and seeds of genera in the subfamily Mimosoideae (Fabaceae). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Technical Bulletin 1681: 1–194.
  21. Gurgel, E.S.C., Santos, J.U.M.D., Lucas, F.C.A. & Bastos, M.D.N.D.C. (2012) Leguminosae seedlings morphology and the systematic potential. Rodriguésia 63 (1): 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2175-78602012000100006
  22. Häfliger, E. & Brun Hool, J. (1971) Comunidades de malas hierbas de Europa. Ciba-Geigy.
  23. Harper, J.L., Lovell, P.H. & Moore, K.G. (1970) The shapes and sizes of seeds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 327–356. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.01.110170.001551
  24. Larson, J.L. (1967) Linnaeus and the natural method. Isis 58 (3): 304–320.
  25. Léonard, J. (1957) Genera des Cynometreae et des Amherstieae africaines (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae). Essai de blastogénie appliquée à la systématique. Mémoires de l’Académie royale de Belgique, Classe des sciences 30 (2): 1–314.
  26. López, J., Devesa, J.A., Ruiz, T. & Ortega-Olivencia, A. (1998) Seedling morphology in Genisteae (Fabaceae) from south-west Spain. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 128 (3): 229–250. https://doi.org/10.1006/bojl.1998.0172
  27. Lu, Y.-B., Huang, Y.-S., Xu, W.-B., Huang, J., Liu, Y., Xiang, C.-L., & Zhang, Q. (2017) Floral evolutionary trend of Petrocodon (Gesneriaceae) and its significance in classification. Guihaia 37 (10).
  28. Mahmood, N., Zaidi, S., Imran, M. & Riaz, M. (2021) Taxonomic importance of seedling morphological data. Pakistan Journal of Botany 53 (4): 1331–1337. https://doi.org/10.30848/PJB2021-4(29)
  29. Maia, L.A., Maia, S. & Parolin, P. (2005) Seedling morphology of non-pioneer trees in central Amazonian várzea floodplain forests. Ecotropica 11 (1–2): 1–8.
  30. Mehmood, N., Imran, M. & Zaidi, S. (2018) Study of seedling morphology of some species collected from Gadap town, Karachi (Pakistan). International Journal of Biology and Biotechnology 15 (2): 225–335.
  31. Montégut, J. & Jauzein, P. (1979) Caractères morphologiques juvéniles des Angiospermes. Intérêt systématique et écophysiologique. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France. Actualités Botaniques 126 (3): 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/01811789.1979.10826408
  32. Mukhopadhyay, S., Bose, A. & Paria, N.D. (2013) Systematic value of seedling morphology of some members of the tribe Spermacoceae of Rubiaceae. Pleione 7 (2): 357–365.
  33. Oliveira, D. & Trombert, M. (2001) Morfologia comparada de plântulas e plantas jovens de leguminosas arbóreas nativas: espécies de Phaseoleae, Sophoreae, Swartzieae e Tephrosieae. Brazilian Journal of Botany 24: 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-84042001000100010
  34. Oliveira, E.D.C. (1993) Morfologia de plântulas florestais. In: Sementes florestais tropicais. Brasília: ABRATES, pp. 175–214.
  35. Ortega-Olivencia, A. & Devesa, J.A. (1997) Seed set and germination in some wild species of Vicia from SW Europe (Spain). Nordic Journal of Botany 17 (6): 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.1997.tb00360.x
  36. Paria, N., Kamilya, P. & Bhattacharya, B. (1995) Seedling morphology in taxonomic studies of some Indian members of the Boraginaceae. Journal of the National Botanical Society 49: 75–81.
  37. Paria, N.D. & Das, D.C. (2002) Seedling morphology in the tribe Vicieae (Leguminosae) with reference to taxonomy. In: Rao, R.R. & Chaudhary, L.B. (Eds.) Advances in Legume Research in India. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, pp. 145–156.
  38. Paria, N.D. (2014) Botanical research in India in the domain of seedling morphology in relation to taxonomy. Science and Culture 80 (9–10): 262–270.
  39. Paria, N.D., Sanyal, S. & Das, M. (2006) Correlation coefficient of some character pairs in certain tree seedlings of Leguminosae. Journal of the Botanical Society of Bengal 60 (2): 134–139.
  40. Pastor-Cavada, E., Juan, R., Pastor, J.E., Alaiz, M. & Vioque, J. (2014) Protein and amino acid composition of select wild legume species of tribe Fabeae. Food Chemistry 163: 97–102.
  41. Pereira, S.A., de Mendonça Queiroz, M.S., Barbalho, C.R.S. & da Silva Mendes, A.M. (2021) Seed and seedling morphology of two species of the genus Jatropha L. (Euphorbiaceae). Revista de Biologia Neotropical/Journal of Neotropical Biology 18 (1): 37–43.
  42. Perrino, E.V., Mahmoud, Z.N.A., Valerio, F., Tomaselli, V., Wagensommer, R.P. & Trani, A. (2023) Synecology of Lagoecia cuminoides L. in Italy and evaluation of functional compounds presence in its water or hydroalcoholic extracts. Scientific Reports 13: 20906. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48065-w
  43. Perrino, E.V., Musarella, C.M. & Magazzini, P. (2021) Management of grazing “buffalo” to preserve habitats by Directive 92/43 EEC in a wetland protected area of the Mediterranean coast: Palude Frattarolo, Apulia, Italy. Euro-Mediterranean Journal for Environmental Integration 6: 32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41207-020-00235-2
  44. Rodrigues, R.S. & de Azevedo Tozzi, A.M.G. (2007) Morfologia de plântulas no clado Vatairea (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae). Rodriguésia 58: 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-7860200758201
  45. Rodrigues, R.S., da Silva Hartmann, L. & Flores, A.S. (2019) Seedling morphology of some Brazilian taxa of Aeschynomene (Leguminosae) and its systematic relevance. Flora 255: 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2019.04.00
  46. Ronse De Craene, L.P. & Wanntorp, L. (2006) Evolution of floral characters in Gunnera (Gunneraceae). Systematic Botany 31 (4): 671–688.
  47. Sastrapradja, S., Sastrapradja, D., Aminah, S.R., Lubis, I. & Idris, S. (1972) Comparative seedling morphology of Mucuna pruriens group. Annales Bogorienses 5 (3): 131–136.
  48. Schaal, B.A. (1980) Reproductive capacity and seed size in Lupinus texensis. American Journal of Botany 67 (5): 703–709.
  49. Sinjushin, A.A. & Akopian, J.A. (2011) On seedling structure in Pisum L., Lathyrus L. and Vavilovia Fed. (Fabeae: Fabaceae). Wulfenia 18: 81–93.
  50. Small, E., Crompton, C.W. & Brookes, B.S. (1981) The taxonomic value of floral characters in tribe Trigonelleae (Leguminosae), with special reference to Medicago. Canadian Journal of Botany 59 (9): 1578–1598.
  51. Sonta, M. & Rekiel, A. (2020) Legumes-use for nutritional and feeding purposes. Journal of Elementology 25 (3).
  52. Stebbins, G.L. (1971) Adaptive radiation of reproductive characteristics in angiosperms, II: seeds and seedlings. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 2 (1): 237–260. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.02.110171.001321
  53. Stinca, A., Chianese, G., D’Auria, G., Del Guacchio, E., Fascetti, S., Perrino, E.V., Rosati, L., Salerno, G. & Santangelo, A. (2017) New alien vascular species for the flora of southern Italy. Webbia 72 (2): 295–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/00837792.2017.1349236
  54. Ujinwal, M., Sahani, P.A. & Singh, N. (2019) Comparative sequence and structural analysis of lectin protein in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and their relationship with Fabaceae family. International Journal of Proteomics Bioinformatics 4: 1–6.
  55. Upton, R., David, B., Gafner, S. & Glasl, S. (2020) Botanical ingredient identification and quality assessment: strengths and limitations of analytical techniques. Phytochemistry Reviews 19 (5): 1157–1177.
  56. Villarias, J.L. (1979) Atlas de malas hierbas. Madrid: Ediciones Mundi-Prensa.
  57. Watt, M., Fiorani, F., Usadel, B., Rascher, U., Muller, O. & Schurr, U. (2020) Phenotyping: new windows into the plant for breeders. Annual Review of Plant Biology 71 (1): 689–712.
  58. Zhou, X.M. & Zhang, L.B. (2023) Phylogeny, character evolution, and classification of Selaginellaceae (lycophytes). Plant Diversity 45 (6): 630–684.