Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Article
Published: 2024-05-08
Page range: 53-90
Abstract views: 95
PDF downloaded: 4

A preliminary study of the morphological variation of rhizomes in Zingiber Mill. and its role in taxonomy

Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation & Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 510650, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China. State Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 510650, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China.
Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation & Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 510650, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China. State Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 510650, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China.
Comparative morphology heteromodular growth monocotyledon plant architecture rhizome unit sympodial terminology Zingiberaceae Zingiberoideae Monocots

Abstract

The rhizomes of Zingiber are highly diverse and have potential in taxonomy, but their fundamental structure has never been properly understood in connection with an understanding of the sympodial growth form of the whole plant. This study is based on a literature review and on observations of fresh materials of 32 Zingiber species mainly from China, representing all four sections of the genus. An analysis of the sympodial modular growth habit of these plants has recognised that both isomodular and heteromodular growth exist within the genus. The study shows that rhizomes of Zingiber are highly-organised, compound, sympodial structures. By introducing the term rhizome unit, Zingiber rhizomes can be meaningfully described by depicting the morphology of the rhizome units and the relative arrangement of these units to one another. Six morphological attributes of rhizome units (shape, size, direction of growth, colour and number of nodes per rhizome, and length of internodes) and two attributes of their relative arrangement to one another (dorsiventral vs lateral position of rhizome units and the ramification position along the length of rhizome unit) are discussed. A preliminary assessment of variation patterns and the taxonomic value of these characters are presented. Together, these attributes contribute to the overall morphology of rhizomes. The relationship between rhizome structure and the above-ground clumping habit is discussed. The term pseudo-neck is coined to refer to the narrowed basal part that occurs in the rhizome units of some Zingiber species while the thick apical part of rhizome units where the internodes are often shorter than those on the pseudo-neck is called head. Problems with existing terminology for rhizome and plant habit descriptions in Zingiber are highlighted. This study suggests that whether the plane of distichy of leaves is parallel or perpendicular to the rhizome unit, a key character that many previous studies used for subdivision of Zingiberaceae, needs re-assessment, because in Zingiber both states of the character exist. Characters of rhizome morphology of the four sections in Zingiber are discussed, but studies of a larger number of species are needed to better-assess the relevance of these characters to the infrageneric classification of the genus. Schematic illustrations and colour plates of rhizomes from representative species are provided to assist the descriptions and discussions. It is hoped that this preliminary study will facilitate and encourage more comprehensive studies of rhizomes of Zingiber and of other genera within Zingiberaceae. Such work will lead to a better understanding of these structures and help establish a more comprehensive and accurate terminology for them, which in turn will facilitate the taxonomy and identification of the family.

References

  1. Andersen, T.F., Johansen, B., Lund, I., Rasmussen, F.N., Rasmussen, H. & Sørensen, I. (1988) Vegetative architecture of Eria. Lindleyana 3: 117–132.
  2. Attigala, L., Wysocki, W.P., Duvall, M.R. & Clark, L.G. (2016) Phylogenetic estimation and morphological evolution of Arundinarieae (Bambusoideae: Poaceae) based on plastome phylogenomic analysis. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 101: 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.05.008
  3. Bai, L., Leong-Škorničková, J. & Xia, N.H. (2015) Taxonomic studies on Zingiber (Zingiberaceae) in China II: Zingiber tenuifolium (Zingiberaceae), a new species from Yunnan, China. Phytotaxa 227: 92–98. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.227.1.10
  4. Bai, L., Leong-Škorničková, J., Xia, N.H. & Li, D.Z. (2018) Taxonomic studies on Zingiber (Zingiberaceae) in China VI: Z. leucochilum, a new species with running rhizome from Sichuan. Nordic Journal of Botany 36: e01840. https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.01840
  5. Bai, L., Leong-Škorničková, J., Xia, N.H. & Ye, Y.S. (2016) Taxonomic studies on Zingiber (Zingiberaceae) in China III: Z. ventricosum, a new species from Yunnan, and notes on three closely related species. Phytotaxa 261: 101–120. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.261.2.1
  6. Bai, L., Maslin, B.R., Triboun, P., Xia, N.H. & Leong-Škorničková, J. (2019) Unravelling the identity and nomenclatural history of Zingiber montanum, and establishing Z. purpureum as the correct name for Cassumunar ginger. Taxon 68: 1334–1349. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12160
  7. Baker, J.G. (1892’1894’) Scitamineae. In: Hooker, J.D. (Ed.) The Flora of British India. L. Reeve, London, pp. 199–257. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.678
  8. Barthélémy, D. & Caraglio, Y. (2007) Plant architecture: a dynamic, multilevel and comprehensive approach to plant form, structure and ontogeny. Annals of Botany 99: 375–407. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcl260
  9. Beentje, H. (2016) The Kew plant glossary: an illustrated dictionary of plant identification terms—Second edition. Royal Botanic Garden, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, UK, 184 pp.
  10. Bell, A.D. (1979) The hexagonal branching pattern of rhizomes of Alpinia speciosa L. (Zingiberaceae). Annals of Botany 43: 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a085626
  11. Bell, A.D. & Bryan, A. (1991) Plant Form: An Illustrated Guide to Flowering Plant Morphology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York & Tokyo, 341 pp.
  12. Bell, A.D. & Tomlinson, P.B. (1980) Adaptive architecture in rhizomatous plants. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 80: 125–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1980.tb01662.x
  13. Bentham, G. & Hooker, J.D. (1883) Genera plantarum. L. Reeve & Co. & Williams & Norgate, London, 811 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.747
  14. Branney, T.M.E. (2005) Hardy gingers: including Hedychium, Roscoea, and Zingiber. Timber Press, Portland & Cambridge, 267 pp.
  15. Burtt, B.L. & Olatunji, O.A. (1972) The limits of the tribe Zingiberaceae. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh 31: 167–169.
  16. Burtt, B.L. & Smith, R.M. (1972) Tentative keys to the subfamily, tribes and genera of Zingiberaceae. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh 31: 171–176.
  17. Chen, J., Xia, N.H. & Bai, L. (2019) A new combination in Zingiber (Zingiberaceae) from China, Z. fallax. Nordic Journal of Botany 37: e02230. https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.02230
  18. Chen, L., Wang, F.G., Dong, A.Q. & Xing, F.W. (2011) Zingiber nanlingensis sp. nov. (Zingiberaceae) from Guangdong, China. Nordic Journal of Botany 29: 43–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.2011.01044.x
  19. Chomicki, G. (2013) Analysis of rhizome morphology of the Zingiberales in Payamino (Ecuador) reveals convergent evolution of two distinct architectural strategies. Acta Botanica Gallica 160: 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/12538078.2013.830073
  20. Choob, V. (2022) Prophyll in Monocots: the starting point of lateral shoot phyllotaxis. Frontiers in Plant Science 13: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.855146
  21. Craib, W.G. (1912) List of Siamese plants, with descriptions of new species—continued. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information, Royal Gardens, Kew 10: 397–405.
  22. Dietrich, A. (1831) Zingiber. In: Linné, C.v. et al. (Eds.) Species plantarum. Editio sexta, 6 ed. Nauck, G.C., Berolini, pp. 50–55. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.7081
  23. Ding, H.B., Ma, Y. & Tan, Y.H. (2023) Zingiber longii (Zingiberaceae), a new species from Southeast Yunnan, China. Taiwania 68: 298–302. https://doi.org/10.6165/tai.2023.68.298
  24. Ding, H.B., Quan, D.L., Zeng, X.D., Li, J.W. & Tan, Y.H. (2021) Zingiber calcicola (Zingiberaceae), a new species from a limestone area in south Yunnan, China. Phytotaxa 525: 65–69. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.525.1.8
  25. Dressler, R.L. (2019) Field guide to the orchids of Costa Rica and Panama. Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London, 374 pp. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501734144
  26. Edelman, S.M. & Richards, J.H. (2019) Review of Vegetative Branching in the Palms (Arecaceae). The Botanical Review 85: 40–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-018-9200-2
  27. Fang, D. (1982) Some new taxa of Zingiberaceae from Guangxi (4). Guihaia 2: 135–141.
  28. Gagnepain, F. (1902) Zingiberacées nouvelles de l’herbier du muséum (1). Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France 49: 247–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/00378941.1902.10830936
  29. Gagnepain, F. (1907) Zingiberacées nouvelles de l’herbier du Muséum (18o note). Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France 54: 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/00378941.1907.10831247
  30. Gevú, K.V., Da Cunha, M., Barros, C.F., Pereira, S.M. & Lima, H.R.P. (2014) Structural analysis of subterranean organs in Zingiberaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 300: 1089–1098. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00606-013-0947-y
  31. Giseke, P.D. (1792) Scitamineae. In: Linnaeus, C. et al. (Eds.) Praelectiones In Ordines Naturales Plantarum. G. F. Schniebes, Hamburgi, pp. 188–273. http://doi.org/10.3931/e-rara-18513
  32. Govaerts, R., Newman, M. & Lock, J.M. (2023, continously updated) World checklist of Zingiberaceae, facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Published on the internet. Available from: http://wcsp.science.kew.org/ (accessed: 2 November 2023).
  33. Griffith, W. & McClelland, J. (1851) Notulae ad plantas asiaticas. Bishop’s college Press Calcutta, 436 pp.
  34. Guo, L., Plunkert, M., Luo, X. & Liu, Z. (2021) Developmental regulation of stolon and rhizome. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 59: 101970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2020.10.003
  35. Hance, H.F. (1880) Spicilegia florae sinensis: diagnoses of new, and habitats of rare or hitherto unrecorded Chinese plants. Journal of Botany, British and Foreign 18: 257–262, 299–303.
  36. Holttum, R.E. (1950) The Zingiberaceae of the Malay Peninsula. Gardens’ Bulletin Singapore 13: 1–249.
  37. Holttum, R.E. (1955) Growth habits of monocotyledons—variation of a theme. Phytomorphology 5: 399–413.
  38. Holttum, R.E. (1974) A Commentary on Comparative Morphology in Zingiberaceae. Gardens’ Bulletin Singapore 17: 155–165. https://biostor.org/reference/177733
  39. Horaninow, P.F. (1862) Prodromus Monographiae Scitaminearum. Typis Academiae Caesareae Scientiarum, Petropoli. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.44562
  40. Howard, C.C., Folk, R.A., Beaulieu, J.M. & Cellinese, N. (2019) The monocotyledonous underground: global climatic and phylogenetic patterns of geophyte diversity. American journal of botany 106: 850–863. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1289
  41. Howard, C.C., Landis, J.B., Beaulieu, J.M. & Cellinese, N. (2020) Geophytism in monocots leads to higher rates of diversification. New Phytologist 225: 1023–1032. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16155
  42. Kress, W.J., Prince, L.M. & Williams, K.J. (2002) The Phylogeny and a new classification of the gingers (Zingiberaceae): Evidence from molecular data. American Journal of Botany 89: 1682–1696. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.89.10.1682
  43. Kuntze, O. (1891) Revisio generum plantarum. Arthur Felix, U. Hoepli, Dulau & Co., Gust. E. Stechert & Charles Klincksieck, Leipzig, Milano,London, New-York & Paris, 735 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.327
  44. Lamxay, V. & Newman, M.F. (2012) A revision of Amomum (Zingiberaceae) in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 69: 99–206. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960428611000436
  45. Leong-Škorničková, J. & Newman, M.F. (2015) Gingers of Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam. Singapore Botanic Gardens, National Parks Board, in associated with Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh, Singapore & Scotland, 229 pp.
  46. Leong-Škorničková, J., Nguyễn, Q.B., Trần, H.Đ., Šída, O., Rybková, R. & Trương, B.V. (2015) Nine new Zingiber species (Zingiberaceae) from Vietnam. Phytotaxa 219: 201–220. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.219.3.1
  47. Li, G.Y., Li, X.P., Chen, Z.H., Ma, D.D. & Lin, H.L. (2021) New Taxa of Seed Plants from Ningbo, Zhejiang Province. In: Li, G.Y. et al. (Eds.) Botanical Research in Ningbo. Science Press, Beijing, pp. 340–345.
  48. Liese, W. & Köhl, M. (2015) Bamboo. The plant and its uses. Springer Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht & London, 356 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14133-6
  49. Lindley, J. (1825) Eria stellatta. The Botanical register 11: t904.
  50. Linnaeus, C. (1753) Species Plantarum (ed. 1). Impensis Laurentii Salvii, Holmiae, 560 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.37656
  51. Loesener, T. (1930) Zingiberaceae. In: Engler, A. & Prantl, K. (Eds.) Die natürliche Pflanzenfamilien, 2 ed. W. Englemann, Leipzig, pp. 541–640.
  52. Lý, N.-S., Đặng, V.-S., Đỗ, Đ.-G., Trần, T.-T., Đỗ, N.-Đ. & Nguyễn, D.-H. (2017) Zingiber nudicarpum D. Fang (Zingiberaceae), a newly recorded species for Vietnam. Bioscience Discovery 8: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960428617000312
  53. Lý, N.-S., Đỗ, Đ.-G., Ngọc-Giang, C., Trương, B.-V., Nguyễn, V.-T. & Leong-Škorničková, J. (2021) Zingiber magang and Z. tamii (Zingiberaceae), two new species from central Vietnam. Taiwania 66: 232‒240. https://doi.org/10.6165/tai.2021.66.232
  54. Mabberley, D.J. (2017) Mabberley’s Plant-book: A Portable Dictionary of Plants, their Classification and Uses. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1102 pp. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316335581
  55. McClure, F. (1925) Some observations on the bamboos of Kwangtung. Lingnaam Agricultural Review 3: 40–47.
  56. McClure, F. (1966) The bamboos. A fresh perspective. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 347 pp. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674428713
  57. Miller, P. (1754 ) The Gardeners Dictionary, ed. 4. Printed for the author and sold by John and James Rivington, London, 516 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.79061
  58. Munro, S.L. (2000) A morphological-anatomical classification of growth forms in monocotyledons. [PhD thesis] University of Cape Town, Cape Town, 333 pp.
  59. Nelson, C.J. & Moore, K.J. (2020) Grass Morphology. In: Moore, K.J., Collins, M., Nelson, C.J. & Redfearn, D.D. (Eds.) Forages: The Science of Grassland Agriculture, 7th Edition. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex, UK, pp. 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119436669.ch2
  60. Newman, M. (2015) A new species of Zingiber (Zingiberaceae) from Lao PDR. Gardens’ Bulletin Singapore 67: 123–127. https://doi.org/10.3850/s2382581215000137
  61. Ongwisespaiboon, O. & Jiraungkoorskul, W. (2017) Fingerroot, Boesenbergia rotunda and its aphrodisiac activity. Pharmacognosy Reviews 11: 27–30. https://doi.org/10.4103/phrev.phrev_50_16
  62. Patil, S., Shinde, R.D., Leong-Škorničková, J. & Chaudhari, R. (2021) Fixing stray traditions in gingers: The identity and nomenclatural history of Zingiber neesanum and other entwined names. Taxon 70 (6): 1339–1351. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12567
  63. Perreta, M., Ramos, J., Tivano, J.C. & Vegetti, A. (2011) Descriptive characters of growth form in Poaceae—an overview. Flora-Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants 206: 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2010.04.022
  64. Petersen, O.G. (1888) Zingiberaceae. In: Engler, A. & Prantl, K.A. (Eds.) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. W. Engelmann, Leipzig, pp. 10–30. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.4635
  65. Rasmussen, H. (1985) ‘Ramicaul’: An improvement within monocotyledon terminology? Taxon 34: 654–657. https://doi.org/10.2307/1222204
  66. Ray, T.S. (1987) Diversity of shoot organization in the Araceae. American Journal of Botany 74: 1373–1387. https://doi.org/10.2307/2444315
  67. Retzius, A.J. (1783) Fasciculus observationum botanicarum, fasc. 3. Apud Siegfried Lebrecht Crusium, Lipsiae [Leipzig] pp.
  68. Retzius, A.J. (1791) Fasciculus Observationum Botanicarum, fasc. 6. Siegfried Lebrecht Crusium, Leipzig, 67 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.11760
  69. Roscoe, W. (1807) A new arrangement of plants of the Monandrian class usually called Scitamineae. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 8: 330–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1807.tb00321.x
  70. Roxburgh, W. (1810) Descriptions of several of the Monandrous plants of India. Asiatic Researches, or Transactions of the Society. Calcutta 11: 318–362.
  71. Roxburgh, W. (1820) Monandria Monogynia. In: Carey, W. (Ed.) Flora Indica. Mission Press, Serampore, pp. 1–82. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.589
  72. Simpson, M.G. (2010) Plant Systematics (Second Edition). Academic Press, San Diego, 741 pp. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374380-0.50007-5
  73. Smith, J.E. (1806) Exotic botany: consisting of coloured figures, and scientific descriptions, of such new, beautiful, or rare plants as [...] Tab. 112. Zingiber zerumbet. R. Taylor & Co., London, 122 pp.
  74. Stapleton, C. (1998) Form and function in the bamboo rhizome. Journal of the American Bamboo Society 12: 21–29.
  75. Tanaka, N., Armstrong, K., Aung, M.M. & Naiki, A. (2020) Taxonomic studies on Zingiberaceae of Myanmar II: Curcuma stolonifera (Subgenus Ecomatae), a new species from the northwestern region. Brittonia 72: 268–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12228-020-09619-8
  76. Tanaka, N. & Aung, M.M. (2017) A new species of Zingiber (Sect. Dymczewiczia: Zingiberaceae) from northwestern Myanmar. Phytotaxa 316: 195–199. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.316.2.9
  77. Tanaka, N., Miyake, K. & Aung, M.M. (2022) Taxonomic studies on Zingiberaceae of Myanmar IV: a new species of Zingiber (sect. Cryptanthium) from Kayah State. Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science. Series B, Botany 48: 17–21. https://doi.org/10.50826/bnmnsbot.48.1_17
  78. Theerakulpisut, P., Triboun, P., Mahakham, W., Maensiri, D., Khampila, J. & Chantaranothai, P. (2012) Phylogeny of the genus Zingiber (Zingiberaceae) based on nuclear ITS sequence data. Kew Bulletin 67: 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12225-012-9368-2
  79. Theilade, I. (1998) Revision of the genus Zingiber in Peninsular Malaysia. Gardens’ Bulletin Singapore 48: 207–236. https://biostor.org/reference/147499
  80. Theilade, I. (1999) A synopsis of the genus Zingiber (Zingiberaceae) in Thailand. Nordic Journal of Botany 19: 389–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.1999.tb01220.x
  81. Theilade, I., Mærsk-Møller, M.L., Theilade, J. & Larsen, K. (1993) Pollen morphology and structure of Zingiber (Zingiberaceae). Grana 32: 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/00173139309428961
  82. Thomas, V., Sabu, M. & Lalramnghinglova, H. (2013) Amomum dampuianum and A. mizoramense spp. nov. (Zingiberaceae) from Mizoram, northeast India. Nordic Journal of Botany 31: 561–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.2012.01312.x
  83. Tillich, H.J. (1998) Development and Organization. In: Kubitzki, K. (Ed.) The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03533-7_1
  84. Tomlinson, P.B. (1956) Studies in the systematic anatomy of the Zingiberaceae. Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Botany 55: 547–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1956.tb00023.x
  85. Tomlinson, P.B. (1962) Phylogeny of the Scitamineae—morphological and anatomical considerations. Evolution 16: 192–213. https://doi.org/10.2307/2406197
  86. Tomlinson, P.B. (1973) The Monocotyledons. Their evolution and comparative biology VIII. Branching in Monocotyledons. The Quarterly Review of Biology 48: 458–466. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2822141]
  87. Tomlinson, P.B. & Esler, A.E. (1973) Establishment growth in woody monocotyledons native to New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany 11: 627–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.1973.10430305
  88. Tomlinson, P.B. & Zimmermann, M.H. (1966) Anatomy of the palm Rhapis excelsa, III. Juvenile phase. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 47: 301–312. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.185714
  89. Tong, S.Q. & Liu, X.Z. (1991) A new species of Zingiber from Yunnan. Acta Botanica Yunnanica 13: 27–29.
  90. Tong, S.Q. & Xia, Y.M. (1987) New taxa of Zingiberaceae from southern Yunnan. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 25: 460–471.
  91. Triboun, P. & Keeratikiet, K. (2015) Zingiber sirindhorniae, a remarkable new species in Zingiber section Dymczewiczia (Zingiberaceae) from Thailand. The Thailand Natural History Museum Journal 10: 1–6.
  92. Turland, N.J., Wiersema, J.H., Barrie, F.R., Greuter, W., Hawksworth, D.L., Herendeen, P.S., Knapp, S., Kusber, W.-H., Li, D.-Z., Marhold, K., May, T.W., McNeill, J., Monro, A.M., Prado, J., Price, M.J. & Smith, G.F. (2018) International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017. Regnum Vegetabile 159. Koeltz Botanical Books, Glashütten. https://doi.org/10.12705/Code.2018
  93. Valeton, T. (1918) New notes on the Zingiberaceae of Java and Malaya. Bulletin du Jardin Botanique de Buitenzorg 27: 1–163.
  94. Wang, C.M., Lin, Y.C. & Tseng, Y.H. (2020) Zingiber chengii (Zingiberaceae), a new species from Taiwan. PhytoKeys 139: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.139.37294
  95. Weisse, A. (1932) Zur Kenntnis der Blattstellungsverhaltnisse bei den Zingiberaceen. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 50A: 327–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1932.tb03831.x
  96. Weisse, A. (1933) Die Art den Distiche an dem Achseesprossen von Zingiber. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 51: 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1933.tb01018.x
  97. White, J. (1979) The plant as a metapopulation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10: 109–145. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.10.110179.000545
  98. Wu, Q.G., Liao, J.P. & Wu, T.L. (1996) A new combination of the genus Zingiber—Z. ellipticum (S.Q.Tong et Y.M.Xia) Q.G.Wu et T.L.Wu and the systermatic evidence. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 34: 415–420.
  99. Wu, T.L., Larsen, K. & Turland, N.J. (2000) Four new names in Chinese and Vietnamese Zingiberaceae. Novon 10: 90–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/3393193
  100. Ye, Y.S., Bai, L. & Xia, N.H. (2015) Zingiber hainanense (Zingiberaceae), a new species from Hainan, China. Phytotaxa 217: 73–79. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.217.1.6
  101. Zhu, Z.Y. (1984) Two new species of Zingiber from Emeishan. Acta Botanica Yunnanica 6: 185–188.