Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Article
Published: 2016-10-19
Page range: 163–172
Abstract views: 36
PDF downloaded: 1

Study of the type material of Navicula egregia Hustedt and descriptions of two new aerial Microcostatus (Bacillariophyta) species from Central Europe

Department of Soil Studies, Environmental Chemistry and Hydrology, Faculty of Biology and Agriculture, University of Rzeszów, Zelwerowicza 8B, 35–601 Rzeszów, Poland
Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), Environmental Research & Innovation (ERIN) Department, 41 rue du Brill, L-4422 Belvaux, Grand-duchy of Luxembourg
Department of Soil Studies, Environmental Chemistry and Hydrology, Faculty of Biology and Agriculture, University of Rzeszów, Zelwerowicza 8B, 35–601 Rzeszów, Poland
Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), Environmental Research & Innovation (ERIN) Department, 41 rue du Brill, L-4422 Belvaux, Grand-duchy of Luxembourg
Microcostatus morphology new taxa Germany Poland Algae

Abstract

The genus Microcostatus was described for the first time by Johansen & Sray in 1998. They established a new genus in the family Naviculaceae for Navicula krasskei. Subsequently, Lange-Bertalot proposed the transfer of further species from the genus Navicula to the Microcostatus. Species determination is very difficult using light microscopy since species are small and very similar to each other, and only ultrastructural features allow their placement in the genus. The aim of this paper was to describe morphologically and ecologically two new species of the genus Microcostatus from aerial habitats in Germany and Poland and compare their morphologies with the original gathering of Navicula egregia. Polish material was collected once a month from April to November 2013 at two sampling sites located in cultivated fields. For comparison, German original material from the Hustedt Collection was also observed. During this study, Microcostatus aerophilus sp. nov. and M. edaphicus sp. nov. were described, and M. egregius was also illustrated and discussed in detail. The species mentioned are very similar to each other under light microscopy. They differ slightly in dimension and number of striae. Only SEM observations showed morphological differences, such as the presence of conopeum or pseudoconopeum.